OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the two disability questionnaires and low back pain severity using the visual analog scale (VAS).
DESIGN: One hundred sixty-two chiropractic patients with low back pain were interviewed using an interactive microcomputer system. The sources of data were the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires for disability and a VAS for pain severity. All were inherent in the computer interview system.
SETTING: The computer review system was set up in the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic.
PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-two consenting new patients from the general community suffering from low back pain who attended the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic were asked to participate.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires for disability and the VAS for low back pain severity.
RESULTS: There was a moderate correlation between the scores from the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability questionnaires (r = .77, p < .0001). A low but significant correlation score was found when comparing the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability score with pain severity (0.38, p < .0001, and 0.47, p < .0001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The consequence of pain (disability) appears to have a weak relationship to pain severity. Despite the moderate correlation between the two disability questionnaires, it is suggested that they are not interchangeable.
This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Article only available in print.
